Deductive Models of Policy Implementation and their Impact on Policy Outcome: A Critical Assessment

Authors

  • Hamidou Issaka Diori The Graduate School of Public Administration (GSPA), National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok 10240, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8563

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.9.1.1-9

Abstract

Deductive models of policy implementation emerged as a response to the inability of inductive approaches to provide nuanced theories of policy implementation and performance. They are said to be parsimonious and precise in studying complex social interactions. Hence, over the last decade or so, there has been ascending interest in the use of deductive approaches to get deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which policy implementation is more likely to succeed. However, giving the fact that numerous programs and policies continue to fail despite being replicated from the best deductive models, one is entitled to wonder: what is the true value of these models? And how effective are they in translating the intentions of policymakers into desired policy outcomes? The present contribution seeks to provide answers to these questions by first, discussing some hands-on deductive models of policy implementation and second, analyzing the potential of each model, their strengths, their weaknesses, and appropriate contexts for use. To reach these aims, the study utilized the Contextual Interaction Theory (CIT) to gauge the assumptions of each of the following models: the Rational, Management, Organizational Development, Political, and Bureaucratic Process. The results have shown that, although deductive models of policy implementation (or at least, the models here-in discussed) seem to offer tangible promises to deliver more accurate and nuanced explanations of policy action, they fall short to combine the three criteria of Motivation, Information, and Power, necessary for any candidate model of policy implementation to be deemed effective. The results have also shown that an integrated model, one that combines the strengths of all the above cited models, but none of their weaknesses, could be a credible offer of a successful theory of policy implementation.

Keywords:

Deductive Model, Policy Implementation, Implementation Outcome

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardach, E. (1980). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. The MIT Press.

Bressers, N., Bressers, J. T. A., & Larrue, C. (2016). Introduction 'Governance for Drought Resilience'. In H. Bressers, N. Bressers, & C. Larrue (Eds.), Governance for Drought Resilience: Land and Water Drought Management in Europe (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29671-5_1.

Bressers, J. T. A., Klok, P. J., & O'Toole, L. J. (2000). Explaining policy action: A deductive but realistic theory. Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress, Quebec, 2000.

Burke, K., Morris, K., & McGarrigle, L. (2012). An Introductory Guide to Implementation: Terms, Concepts and Frameworks. Centre for Effective Services.

Diori, H. I. (2021). A Critical Insight into Needs Assessment Technique and the Way Social Needs are Actually Assessed. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 8 (1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.8.1.3-9

Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., Romanelli, L. H., Leaf, P. J., Greenberg, M. T., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008). Maximizing the Implementation Quality of Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions in Schools: A Conceptual Framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1(3), 6–28.

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327–50.

Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core Implementation Components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19 (5), 531– 540.

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1-14.

Khan, A. R., & Khandaker, S. (2016). A Critical Insight into Policy Implementation and Implementation Performance. Public Policy and Administration, 15(4), 538–548.

Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3-4), 462–80.

Mthethwa, R. M. (2012). Critical dimensions for policy implementation. African Journal of Public Affairs, 5(2), 36-47.

Oh, A., Abazeed, A., & Chambers, D.A. (2021). Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems. Front. Public Health, 9:681602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.681602.

Owens, K. A., & Bressers, J. T. A. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of How Actors Implement: Testing the Contextual Interaction Theory in 48 Cases of Wetland Restoration. Journal of comparative policy analysis, 15(3), 203-219.

Owens, K. A. (2008). Understanding how actors influence policy implementation: a comparative study of wetland restorations in New Jersey, Oregon, the Netherlands and Finland. Enschede: University of Twente.

Pressman, J. L., & Wildawsky, A. (1973). Implementation (2nd edition). University of California Press.

Seatren, H. (2014). Implementing the Third Generation Research Paradigm in Policy Implementation Research: An Empirical Assessment. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi:10.1177/0952076713513487.

Signé, L. (2017). Policy Implementation: A synthesis of the Study of Policy Implementation and the Causes of Policy Failure. Research papers & Policy papers, 1703. Policy Center for the New South.

Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., Blachman, M., Dunville, R., & Saul, S. (2008). Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4),171–81.

Winter, S. C. (2012). Implementation perspectives: status and reconsideration. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration (pp. 265-278). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446200506.n17

Downloads

Published

2021-09-26

How to Cite

Diori, H. I. (2021). Deductive Models of Policy Implementation and their Impact on Policy Outcome: A Critical Assessment. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.9.1.1-9