Pharmaceutical Company In-house Research and Licensing Transaction Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.8.1.77-85Abstract
Background: Pharmaceutical in-house research and licensing deals are effective means of widespread production of drugs to the public. These transactions follow a normalized procedure requiring upfront payments between a buying company to work either collaboratively with a small to medium sized selling company or buying the right of a product completely. Licensing a novel pharmaceutical drug goes through several clinical phases, and transaction deals can involve royalty and/or milestone payments along the research and clinical trial process.
Methods: Data was collected through analysis of pharmaceutical licensing market deals via online databases and extracted to a data sheet for examination. Trends were highlighted after analyzing upfront payment values, royalty sales, milestone payments and total transaction deal value.
Results: Total milestone payments averaged at USD $639.1 million, and total royalty payments averaged at USD $899.77 million. Average total deal values is USD $1445.18 million. Correlation coefficients between: (1) upfront and milestone payments r = 0.155; (2) upfront payments and royalty payments r = 0.188; and (3) upfront payments and total deal value r = 0.604. Most transactions are a small/medium enterprise selling to big pharmaceutical companies (32%) or a big pharmaceutical company selling to a small/medium enterprise (32%). 27% of deals are between big pharmaceutical companies, and 9% of deals are between small/medium enterprises.
Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between upfront payment costs with milestone/royalty costs and total deal value (n=25). Small or medium enterprises are beginning to take a large sector of the transaction business as their in-house research licensing grows more appealing for market distribution.
Keywords:
Licensing, pharmaceuticals, transactionDownloads
References
Schuhmacher, A., Gassmann, O. and Hinder, M. (2016). Changing R&D models in research-based pharmaceutical companies. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14(1). Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-016-0838-4
Arnold, K., Coia, A., Saywell, S., Smith, T., Minick, S. and Löffler, A. (2002). Value drivers in licensing deals. Nature Biotechnology, 20(11), pp.1085-1089. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA190106398&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=10870156&p=AONE&sw=w
Pharma 2020: The vision. (2020). Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.vph-institute.org/upload/pwc-pharma2020-report_5192450c305bd.pdf
Simonet, D, 2002. Licensing Agreements in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Medical Marketing, 2(4), 329-341. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1057/palgrave.jmm.5040090
F, A. (2019). Why pharmaceutical companies are on a shopping binge. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2019/01/14/why-pharmaceutical-companies-are-on-a-shopping-binge
O’Connell, K. E. (2014). The premium of a big pharma license deal. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25004224/
The growing pharmaceuticals market: Expert forecasts and analysis. (2018). Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://blog.marketresearch.com/the-growing-pharmaceuticals-market-expert-forecasts-and-analysis
Business insights, analysis & perspectives. (2019). Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en.html
Wong, C. H., Siah, K. W., & Lo, A. W. (2019). Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://academic.oup.com/biostatistics/article/20/2/273/4817524
About Dillon Capital Strategies. (2019). Retrieved March 12, 2021, from http://dilloncapital.com/
Torjesen, I. (2015). Drug development: the journey of a medicine from lab to shelf. Pharmaceutical Journal. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/publications/tomorrows-pharmacist/drug-de velopment-the-journey-of-a-medicine-fro m-lab-to-shelf/20068196.article?firstPass=false
Sullivan, T. (2019). A Tough Road: Cost To Develop One New Drug Is $2.6 Billion; Approval Rate for Drugs Entering Clinical Development is Less Than 12%. Policymed.com. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.policymed.com/2014/12/a-tou gh-road-cost-to-develop-one-new-drug-is- 26-billion-approval-rate-for-drugs-entering -clinical-de.html
Kessel, M. and Hall, S. (2006). Avoiding premature licensing. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5(12), pp.985-986. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd2203
Urquhart, L. and Elmhirst, E. (2018). Oncology continues to reign in the licensing world. Evaluate.com. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/8. FIGURES and LEGENDSdata-insights/other-data/oncology-continues-reign-licensing-world-0
Iam-media.com. (2018). Oncology drives major pharma deals while immuno-oncology patent activity soars. IAM. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.iam-media.com/market-developments/oncology-drives-major-pharma-deals-while-immuno-oncology-patent-activity
Pharmaceutical Technology (2017). Pharma licensing deals 2016/2017 comparison. Pharmaceutical Technology. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.co m/research-reports/researchreportpharma-licensing-deals-20162017-comparison-5794903/
Staton, T. (2017). AstraZeneca, Merck team up on Lynparza combos in collaboration worth up to $8.5B. FiercePharma. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/astrazeneca-merck-team-up-lynparza-combos-collab-worth-up-to-8-5b
Life science leader. (2019). Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.lifescienceleader.com/
Comparing 3 Popular Pricing Models: Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, and Milestone. Medium. 2019. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://medium.com/swlh/comparing-3-popular-pricing-models-fixed-price-time-materials-and-milestone-6b986021f2ed
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Drago, Katelynn Cahill, Alannah Grealy, Kieran Lucey, Muhammad Mahmoud

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retains full copyright of their article and grants non-exclusive publishing right to Advanced Journal of Social Science and its publisher AIJR Publisher. Author(s) can archive pre-print, post-print, and published version/PDF to any open access, institutional repository, social media, or personal website provided that Published source must be acknowledged with citation and link to publisher version.
Click here for more information on Copyright policy
Click here for more information on Licensing policy