A Critical Insight into Needs Assessment Technique and the Way Social Needs are Actually Assessed

Authors

  • Hamidou Issaka Diori The Graduate School of Public Administration (GSPA), National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8563

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.8.1.3-9

Abstract

Needs assessment is regarded as a powerful tool for addressing the needs for a program, and for various other purposes including strategic planning for resource allocation, priority setting, and improving the course of an ongoing program. As such, it is portrayed as an ideal and necessary step in policymaking. On the other hand, however, there are some growing concerns about the actual needs assessment practice which is believed by many to be prejudicing the performance of countless policies and programs. Hence, looking into this dichotomy of views and the way social needs are actually assessed are of particular interest. The present contribution seeks to delve deep into the technique of needs assessment and to give an insight on what ought to be done in the field and what is being done in fact. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify and analyze all available research studies that address the function of needs assessment, the problem definition in need assessment, the identification and classification of needs, the definition, description, and specification of target populations, and the description of the nature of service needs. The content of the relevant sections in each study was then read and reread with the aim of determining how social needs are assessed indeed. The result has shown that needs, their identification, and the way they are met, are in most cases determined by experts and agencies, not the needy populations. The search has also revealed the existence of significant gaps between the needs identified by professionals and those seen as important by the people who they are supposed to benefit. Finally, the result suggests that experts and agencies’ definition and identification of needs or target populations only reflect their own views or choices of program activity and the reasons they brandish in seeking for funding.

Keywords:

Needs Assessment, Policy Evaluation, Social Needs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkire, S. (2005). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford University Press.

Bani I. A. (2008). Health needs assessment. Journal of family & community medicine, 15(1), 13–20.

Beran, D. (2015). Needs and Needs Assessments: A Gap in the Literature for Chronic Diseases. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015580375

Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical Program Evaluation: Theory-Driven Evaluation and the Integrated Evaluation Perspective (2nd Edition). Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Currid, T. (2012) Meeting the psychological needs of the physically ill. Nursing Times, 108(46), 22-25. https://www.nursingtimes.net/meeting-the-psychological-needs-of-the-physically-ill/5051622.article

Eldridge, D., Dawber, N., & Gray, R. (2011). A well-being support program for patients with severe mental illness: a service evaluation. BMC Psychiatry, 11(46). DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-46

Gough, I. (2004). Human well-being and social structures: Relating the universal and the local. Global Social Policy, 4, 289-311.

Hill, H., Evans, J.M. & Forbat, L. (2015). Nurses respond to patients’ psychosocial needs by dealing, ducking, diverting and deferring: an observational study of a hospice ward. BMC Nursing 14(60). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0112-8

Moadel, A. B., Morgan, C. & Dutcher, J. (2007). Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer, 109(Suppl.), 446-454. doi:10.1002/cncr.22357

Ní Shé, É., O’Donnell, D., Donnelly, S., Davies, C., Fattori, F., & Kroll, T. (2020) “What Bothers Me Most Is the Disparity between the Choices that People Have or Don’t Haveâ€: A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(9), p. 3294.

Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation (2nd edition). University of California Press.

Regber, S., Novak, M., Eiben, G., Lissner L., Hense, S., Sandström, T. Z. & Ahrens, W. (2013). Assessment of selection bias in a health survey of children and families. The IDEFICS Sweden-study. BMC Public Health 13, 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-418

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M.W. & Henry, G. T. (2019). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th Edition). Sage Publications.

Royse, D., Thyer, B. A. & Padgett, D. K. (2016). Program Evaluation: An Introduction to an Evidence Based Approach (6th edition). Cengage Learning; Boston, MA

St. John, V.; Murphy, K., & Liberman, A. (2020). Recommendations for Addressing Racial Bias in Risk and Needs Assessment in the Juvenile Justice System. https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Duke-Risk-Assessment-FAQ_ChildTrends_Jan2020-1.pdf

Tish Knobf, M., Ferrucci, L.M., Cartmel, B., Jones, B. A., Stevens, D., Smith, M., & Salner, A. (2012). Needs assessment of cancer survivors in Connecticut. J Cancer Surviv 6, 1–10 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0198-2

VeneKlasen, L., Miller, V., Budlender, D., & Clark, C. (2007). A new weave of power, people, and politics: The action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. Practical Action Pub.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-02

Issue

Section

Short Review

How to Cite

Diori, H. I. (2021). A Critical Insight into Needs Assessment Technique and the Way Social Needs are Actually Assessed. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 8(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.8.1.3-9